June 2021
Councillor Michael Barnacle
Newsletter Editorial Policy
I note from the May edition that you say the newsletter is politically neutral. As you are aware, I changed my political allegiance at PKC in March and sent you my statement on the 3 reasons why, which you were originally going to publish in my column for May but then, on reflection, changed your mind, stating it was too political at election time. I note, however, that you allowed Councillor Watters to make political points in his column. I find it strange that you are happy to print reader’s political opinions at election time but not those from all local Elected Councillors, most of whom are elected representing a political party and usually campaign for those parties at election time.
The above suggests it is not a level playing field. The idea that Elected Councillors should not be able to comment before an election to either Holyrood or Westminster, when national policies directly affect their local authority is quite frankly “a denial of democracy”. I was particularly aggrieved that you did not, at the very least, print the opening paragraph of my statement and the principal reason for my change of allegiance, in relation to my successful lobbying of the Conservative Group to endorse my proposal for a funded “pilot” Area Committee for Kinross-shire that I have been campaigning for as an Elected Member since 1999; whilst allowing Councillor Watters to challenge the speed with which other Elected Members wish to bring this proposal to fruition (it has been frustrated by officer obfuscation for years), when his party made no such commitment in their failed budget motion. Whilst I am under no illusion that my statement would have made any difference to the eventual outcome in Perthshire South and Kinross-shire, I challenge above the way the newsletter have handled things for the May edition, by way of broader principle.
I assume you are the sole arbiter of editorial content and have not been influenced by others with a different political agenda. Finally, I believe this to be the first occasion in over 20 years as a Councillor that I have made criticism of the newsletter and hopefully it will be the last; because in all other respects than my comments above, I find it an excellent local publication and think you do a wonderful job in putting it together every month.
Cllr Michael Barnacle Scottish Conservative and Unionist Councillor

May 2017 elections subject topics
Border signage, that he helped establish, should be enhanced and expanded. Mike was also involved in successfully campaigning for the maintenance of Kinross’s identity as a Council ward, with four councillors and has made representations on the proposed review for the UK Parliament constituency.
Support for local groups and praise the KCT’s 25 years of action since 1991 in seeking to protect Kinross-Shire from inappropriate development; including the ‘best kept village’ competition, originally established by Kinross County Council in 1966 and still going strong under KCT’s control.
Mike has been involved in footpath initiatives across the County since he was first elected. He currently serves as community representative for Kinross-Shire on the Council’s Outdoor Access Forum and was also opposition Councillor on the Council’s Countryside Trust during the last council term.
Since being elected, Mike has been involved in delivering improvements to our school estate and commends the excellent reports that many of our schools have received. Particularly worthy of note are Loch Leven Community Campus (issues continue around opening hours and charges for lets) and the new primary school currently being built for Kinross. There is a continuing need for improvements at Cleish Primary and Arngask Primary
Mike, as a previous convener of the Environment Committee, oversaw the introduction of the “three bin system” to the majority of households and the roll-out of a number of recycling points such as the one at Crook village hall and near Arngask primary school. Scotlandwell now has a recycling point but there remain other communities that need this facility. Mike is currently working on new locations for Kinnesswood and Powmill.
“
Since the last election in 2012, Mike has been involved in
Conditions attached to the Braehead development have yet to be met and this continues to be a source of annoyance. Mike and local residents met in February with the council’s enforcement officer re the lack of progress.
Approved by PKC development control committee against the wishes of local residents and Local members and contrary to the council’s landscape consultants advice (a fact not reported to the committee) has been occupied since March 2012
A ditch management scheme is still needed Mike has had exploratory meetings with Perth & Kinross Council, SEPA and some landowners to try and progress.